ISU-ISU KRITIS DALAM PENDIDIKAN ISLAM PERSPEKTIF PEDAGOGIK KRITIS

Main Article Content

Tabrani ZA

Abstract

Conceptualization and theorization of Islamic education has been less attention to aspects of his involvement in the process of social transformation. In addition, Islamic Education also seems to have developed to the maximum language of language of critique and possibility. Literature related to Islamic education from the past until now tend to be dominated by a normative approach, with little practical in many aspects and ignore the discursive historical-empirical level. Until now, even the idea of the concept of Islamic education promoted by thinkers of contemporary Islamic education has not touched the real issues related to humanitarian issues. There is no attempt to draw normative concepts, ideal and abstract, to the empirical-sociological level. When the concept of Islamic education is faced with the problems of empirical-sociological and just wrestle on normative issues, the Islamic education could be stuck in the ideology of positivism that tend to deny the importance of criticism of social reality. Therefore, Islamic education needs to balance-normative aspects of religious and historical.

Article Details

Section

Artikel

References

A. Totah, Khahl. The Contribution of the Arabs to Education. New York: Teachers College, Colombia University, 1926.

Arifin, Muzaiyyin. Kapita Selekta Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara, 2003.

Bakker, Ontologi atau Metafisika Umum. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1992.

Barnadib, Imam. Filsafat Pendidikan: Sistem dan Metode. Yogyakarta: Andi Ofset, 1994.

Bowles, Samuel dan Gintis, Herbert. Schooling in Capitalist America. New York: Basic Boks, 1992.

Derajat, Zakiah. Ilmu Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1993.

Dimyati, M. Dilema Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan. Malang: IPTI. 2001.

Freire, Paulo and Macedo, Donaldo P. Literary: Reading the Word and the World. South Hadley, Mass: Bergin & Carvey Publishers, 1987.

Freire, Paulo. Education for Critical Consciousness. New York: Seabury Press, 1995.

__________. Politics and Education. UCLA: UCLA Latin American Center

Publications, 1998.

Giroux, Henry. Border Crossing: A Cultural Workers and the Politics of Education. New York: Routledge, 1993.

__________. Border Crossing: A Kultural Workers and the Politics of Education. New York: Routledge, 1993.

__________. Theory and Resistance in Education: A Pedagogy for the Opposition. New York: Bergin & Harvey Publishers, 1983.

Habermas, Jurgen. Knowledge and Human Interest. Boston: Beacon, 1971.

Imam Zamroni, M. Pendidikan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Kecil. Yogyakarta: Presma UIN Sunan Kalijaga, 2004.

Keraf, Sonny A. dan Dua, Michael. Ilmu Pengetahuan Sebuah Tinjauan Filosofis. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2001.

Kincheloe, Joe. Critical Pedagogy. New York: Peter Lang, 2005.

Lankshear, Cohn.“Functional Literacy from a Point of View,” dalam Pets McLaren dan Peter Leonard (ed), Paulo Freire: A Critical Encounter. London aid New York: Routledge, 1993.

Marcuse, Herbert. One-Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon Press, 1964.

Nata, Abuddin. Rekonstruksi Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2009.

Nuh, Thomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.

Slameto, Belajar dan Fakto Perkembangan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2004.

Susanto, A. Pemikiran Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Amzah, 2009.

Tholkhah, Imam dan Barizi, Ahmad. Membuka Jendela Pendidikan; Mengurai Akar Tradisi dan Integrasi Keilmuan Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004.

V. Taylor, Paul. The Texts of Paulo Freire. Philadelphia: Open University Press, 1994.

Y.W.S. Usman Bharat, Nugaan. Hubungan Potensi belajar. Bandung: Rineka Cipta, 2003.

Zamroni, Paradigma Pendidikan Masa Depan. Yogyakarta: BIGRAF Publishing, 2000.