IBN RUSHD’S INTELLECTUAL STRATEGIES ON ISLAMIC THEOLOGY

Main Article Content

Hamid Fahmy Zarkasyi
Amal Fathullah Zarkasyi
Tonny Ilham Prayogo
Rahmat Ardi Nur Rifa Da’i

Abstract

Islamic theology as axiology that advocates various social inequalities both social and religious aspects. Although it is recognized that Ibn Rushd had the capacity as the greatest Muslim philosopher who was influential not only in the Islamic world but in the West. However, another fact Ibn Rushd was also an Islamic theologian based on philosophical and jurisprudential views. Both of these sources influenced Ibn Rushd's theology which was more rational but did not lead liberal because it was following his jurisprudence. This simple research is a type of library research, using theological approach. In this article, the writer wishes to present the analysis of Ibn Rushd on the views of theology, Ibn Rushd wa not only theologian but also a philosopher and jurist of Islam. This was interesting to be discussed; first, whether Ibn Rushd’s theology was different from other figures of theologians. Second, whether his philosophical and jurisprudential view affected his theology thought. The result of this writing showed that Ibn Rushd had unique strategies on Islamic theology, so the two strategies are Dalil al-‘Inayah and Dalil al-Ikhtira’. In this strategies, showed that Ibn Rushd had unique theology thought which his philosophical and juristprudential view affected his theology so that his theology was more rational but it was not too liberal. So in this article. Showed that Ibn Rushd had application are explained three important thoughts of Ibn Rusyd relating to the themes of Kalam namely; The oneness of God, the attributes of God and the matter of monotheism

Article Details

Section

Artikel

References

A. K. Soleh, “Mencermati Sejarah Perkembangan Filsafat Islam,” TSAQAFAH, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 63, 2014.

H. Susanto, “Kritisisme Sejarah Teologi Barat,” TSAQAFAH, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 299, 2011.

C. S. Song, “From Israel to Asia—a Theological Leap,” Theology, vol. 79, no. 668, pp. 90–96, 1976.

R. Anwar, Ilmu Kalam. 2006.

A. Child, “ A History of Philosophical Systems . Vergilius Ferm ,” The Journal of Religion, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 228–228, 1951.

C. Brown and S. V. Utechin, “Everyman’s Concise Encyclopaedia of Russia,” The Slavic and East European Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 85, 1963.

S. Bevans, “Models of Contextual Theology,” Practical Anthropology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 185–202, 1985.

Hasan Hanafi, Min al-Aqidah ila Al-Tsaurah, 1st ed. Kairo: Maktabah Matbuli, 1991.

Ibnu Rushd, “al-Kasyf ’an Manahij al-Adillah fii 'Aqaidi al-Millah,” Muhammad Abid al-Jabiri, Ed. Beirut: Markaz Dirasat al-Wahdat al-’Arabiyah, 1998.

Muhammad “Athif al-”Iraqi, Al-Manhaj al-Naqdi fi Falsafah Ibn Rusyd. Mesir: Dar al-Ma’arif, 1968.

F. TERKAN, “IBN RUSHD, FASL AL-MAQAL AND THE THEORY OF DOUBLE TRUTH,” İstanbul Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, no. 13, 2006.

Aminullah el-Hady, Ibn Rusyd Membela Tuhan; Filsafat Ketuhanan Ibn Rusyd. Surabaya: Lembaga Pengkajian Agama dan Masyarakat (LPAM), 2004.

J. Hoover, “Perpetual Creativity in the Perfection of God: Ibn Taymiyya’s Hadith Commentary on God's Creation of this World,” Journal of Islamic Studies, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 287–329, 2004.

Abbas Mahmud al-’Aqqad, Allah: Kitab fi Nafsyiah al-’Aqidah al-Ilahiyyah. Kairo: Dar al-Ma’arif, 1969.

Bertrand Russel, Sejarah Filsafat Barat: Kaitannya dengan Kondisi Sosio-Politik Zaman Kuno Hingga Sekarang. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2004.

R. C. Taylor, “Averroes: Religious dialectic and Aristotelian philosophical thought,” in The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy, 2004, pp. 180–200.

H. Hanafi, “The Origin of Modern Conservatism and Islamic Fundamentalism,” in Islamic Dilemmas: Reformers, Nationalists and Industrialization, 2019, pp. 94–103.

“25 Tahun Pembaharuan Pemikiran Islam,” Jurnal Ulumul Quran, vol. VI, no. No. 3, 1995.